References

The Origins of Western Thought
An excellent and concise introduction to Presocratic philosophy. Use the links to explore concepts and individuals. When reading, work to form and idea of how Thales fits into the history and how his ideas compare to other Presocratics.

Thales of Miletus
An outstanding article by Patricia O'Grady. This is well worth reading thoughtfully.

Thales
Wikipedia article with several useful links to important terms.

 

 

 

Thales

Eclipse of reason
Mythic thought and analytic thought

The term Mythic Thought is descriptive of a way of understanding that is older than all of recorded history. Mythic thought is a way of explaining facts in the world by relating stories involving supernatural agencies with human-like qualities. In contemporary language, the word old picture of sun and moon as godsmyth has a connotation of a false belief or illusion. This negative evaluation is not important to our consideration here at all. Mythic thinking remains a widely held mode of explaining the world today. Indeed, narratives that explain reality via divine action might be important aspects of the belief systems of people reading this passage right now. I emphasize that the present exegesis is not claiming that mythic thinking is erroneous or that mythic narrative accounts of reality are false. Such a thesis can be maintained and is worth arguing, but that is not at all the purpose of this piece. Rather, by distinguishing mythic thought from analytic thought we are able to characterize two different ways of approaching reality. Thales is distinguished from his contemporaries because he departed from their mythic accounts of reality and sought analytic explanations of reality.

For instance, Thales correctly predicted the occurrence of a total solar eclipse. We do not know how he achieved this, but he was a master of astronomy, geometry, and mathematics, so he had the necessary tools. The crucial point is that Greek culture already had a conventional explanation for solar eclipses. The poet Archilochus, who was contemporary to Thales, wrote;

“Nothing there is beyond hope nothing can be sworn impossible nothing wonderful. Since Zeus father of Olympians made night from mid-day hiding the light of the shining-sun and sore fear upon man.”

This Greek account is similar to that given in the Hebrew book of Amos from roughly the same period in history.

“And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord GOD, that I will cause the sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the earth in the clear day.” (Amos, 8:9).

Most cultures have mythical accounts explaining the phenomena of the solar eclipse. In many cases the implication of an eclipse is a divine anger that must be appeased. Mythic thought provides explanations for the way things are through stories supported by tradition that invoke a supernatural agency with human-like qualities. Knowing the story, and perhaps what one should do in response to the story, is a sufficient understanding of the world for the mythic mind.

Please note again that by speaking of supernatural accounts of the natural world I am not saying that they are false or spurious. The word “myth” has a negative connotation in contemporary language. For the present consideration I am fully willing to accept the possibility that a solar eclipse is caused by a deity removing the sun from the sky. Indeed, some cultures including Greeks regarded the sun and moon as gods, thereby adding greater force to the mythic account. The important point is that Thales provides an alternate way of thinking about natural phenomena. According to Aetius;

“Thales says that the eclipses of the sun take place when the moon passes across it in a direct line. Since the moon is earthly in character, and it seems to the eye to be laid on the disc of the sun.”

Thales provides a purely naturalistic account which is based on an analysis of the objects involved (i.e. sun, moon, light, eye). Thales makes no mention of supernatural beings in his photograph of sun in eclipse seen from earthexplanation. Morever, Thales views his sort of account as having practical value: he is able to make predictions of events that have impact on human affairs. No one would have dared to predict the actions of the gods, an eclipse is an occasion to fear and appease the divine agent. Thales provides a very different approach in which natural phenomena have natural causes and practical uses. This is why Thales is consider to be at the cutting edge of the origin of science.

Again, many people today hold books of sacred scriptures to be literal and accurate accounts photograph of sun in eclipse seen from spaceof the origins and nature of reality. On that view, where the book says that an eclipse is caused by god removing the sun from the sky out of anger, that is precisely what has happened and no other explanation is needed. That form of thinking remains powerful today, especially in the United States. In the seventh century B.C.E. Thales provided an alternative way of thinking; once based in analysis, methods of demonstration, and with practical implications. The method of Thales has one main advantage: it can be tested. This is the difference between the mythical and analytic ways of thinking. Philosophy grew out of the analytic mode of thought.

Next - learn more about concrete thought and abstract thought link to Augustine on faith

 

 

IQ Home

Aquinas
Aristotle
Augustine
Berkeley
Confucius
Descartes

Douglass

Foucault
Hobbes
Hume
Hypatia
Kant
Kierkegaard
Lao Tzu
Leibniz
Locke
Marx
Mill
Montaigne
Pascal
Plato
Protagoras
Rand
Russell
Schopenhauer
Socrates
Spinoza
Thales

 
2002