References

Augustine
A philosophical biography from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Read it.

Philosophy of Augustine
An extensive resource from the Radical Academy.

Augustine on Evil
by Gregory Koukl
A very interesting, accessible, and brief article from a Christian perspective. I strongly recommend that you read this as it makes one aspect of Augustine's influence quite clear.

Augustine of Hippo
Something of a fan site for Augustine aficionados. There is a lot of material here, including Augustine's major texts (in Latin, even.) Use this selectively to investigate what people are saying about Augustine today.

 

 

Augustine: on faith

Faith, Belief, and Knowledge

Enchridion is Latin for "handbook."  Augustine's Enchridion is a handbook to Christian thought and is philosophical through and through.  Some people may regard it sufficient for faith to simply believe and not question.  Augustine goes so far as to explain the concept of faith and how it relates to other concepts.  If you study the below passage for its reasoning and method of conceptual analysis, you can learn skills that are applicable to many subject matters.

In this short selection from his Enchridion (Chapter 2) Augustine examines some aspects of the concepts of "faith." He draws some conclusions about the nature of faith by comparison to other concepts. Consider the following questions as you read this passage:
question 1Do you experience (or think of) faith as a kind of belief, a species of knowledge, or something else?
In this section Augustine uses conceptual analysis to make a distinction between two ideas: hope and belief. How does he show that these ideas are different?

From the Enchridion, by Augustine

     Let us begin, for example, with the Symbol and the Lord's Prayer. What is shorter to hear or to read? What is more easily memorized? Since through sin the humanrace stood grievously burdened by great misery and in deep need of mercy, a prophet, preaching of the time of God's grace, said, "And it shall be that all who invoke the Lord's name will be saved." Thus, we have the Lord's Prayer. Later, the apostle, when he wished to commend this same grace, remembered this prophetic testimony and promptly added, "But how shall they invoke him in whom they have not believed?" Thus, we have the Symbol.
     In these two we have the three theological virtues working together: faith believes; hope and love pray. Yet without faith nothing else is possible; thus faith prays too. This, then, is the meaning of the saying, "How shall they invoke him in whom they have not believed?". Now, is it possible to hope for what we do not believe in? We can, of course, believe in something that we do not hope for. Who among the faithful does not believe in the punishment of the impious? Yet he does not hope for it, and whoever believes that such a punishment is threatening him and draws back in horror from it is more rightly said to fear than to hope.
     A poet, distinguishing between these two feelings, said, "Let those who dread be allowed to hope," but another poet, and a better one, did not put it rightly: "Here, if I could have hoped for [i.e., foreseen] such a grievous blow..." Indeed, some grammarians use this as an example of inaccurate language and comment, "He said 'to hope' when he should have said 'to fear.'" Therefore faith may refer to evil things as well as to good, since we believe in both the good and evil. Yet faith is good, not evil.
      Moreover, faith refers to things past and present and future. For we believe that Christ died; this is a past event. We believe that he sits at the Father's right hand; this is present. We believe that he will come as our judge; this is future. Again, faith has to do with our own affairs and with those of others. For everyone believes, both about himself and other persons--and about things as well--that at some time he began to exist and that he has not existed forever. Thus, not only about men, but even about angels, we believe many things that have a bearing on religion. But hope deals only with good things, and only with those which lie in the future, and which pertain to the man who cherishes the hope. Since this is so, faith must be distinguished from hope: they are different terms and likewise different concepts.
      Yet faith and hope have this in common: they refer to what is not seen, whether this unseen is believed in or hoped for. Thus in the Epistle to the Hebrews, which is used by the enlightened defenders of the catholic rule of faith, faith is said to be "the conviction of things not seen." However, when a man maintains that neither words nor witnesses nor even arguments, but only the evidence of present experience, determine his faith, he still ought not to be called absurd or told, "You have seen; therefore you have not believed." For it does not follow that unless a thing is not seen it cannot be believed.
     
Still it is better for us to use the term "faith," as we are taught in "the sacred eloquence," to refer to things not seen. And as for hope, the apostle says: "Hope that is seen is not hope. For if a man sees a thing, why does he hope for it? If, however, we hope for what we do not see, we then wait for it in patience." When, therefore, our good is believed to be future, this is the same thing as hoping for it. What, then, shall I say of love, without which faith can do nothing? There can be no true hope without love. Indeed, as the apostle James says, "Even the demons believe and tremble." Yet they neither hope nor love. Instead, believing as we do that what we hope for and love is coming to pass, they tremble. Therefore, the apostle Paul approves and commends the faith that works by love and that cannot exist without hope. Thus it is that love is not without hope, hope is not without love, and neither hope nor love are without faith.

question 3Augustine says that; "faith may refer to evil things as well as to good". Do you think this is correct?
question 4Augustine speaks of the relation of faith to evidence. On some descriptions it seems that faith belongs to that area of belief in that for which we have no evidence ("not seen.") On the other hand, Augustine points out that the lack of evidence for something is not a necessary condition for our having faith in it. What do you think? How does evidence relate to faith?

 

Next - learn more about Augustine's analysis of Evil link to Augustine on faith


 

IQ Home

Aquinas
Aristotle
Augustine
Berkeley
Confucius
Descartes

Douglass

Foucault
Hobbes
Hume
Hypatia
Kant
Kierkegaard
Lao Tzu
Leibniz
Locke
Marx
Mill
Montaigne
Pascal
Plato
Protagoras
Rand
Russell
Schopenhauer
Socrates
Spinoza
Thales

 
2002