Grant, Contract & Gift Accounting Manual
Section 100: General Administration of Award
Effective: 09/19/2004
Revised: 04/23/2012
To insure proposals meet institutional standards.
All employees.
Signature authority for sponsored proposals and related sponsored award issues rests with the Director of the Office of Sponsored Programs, or designee. Sponsored projects may require a variety of institutional signatures in order to be accepted by the sponsor. Signatures must be obtained prior to submission of proposals.
The following persons have signature authority in their authorized capacities.
|
Patricia A. Hawk, Director |
|
Eric Anundson, Lin Reilly, Aedra Reynolds, Vickie Watkins Office of Sponsored Programs Oregon State University 312 Kerr Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331-2140 (541) 737-4933 phone (541) 737-3093 fax Sponsored.Programs@oregonstate.edu |
|
Kim Calvery, Assistant Director Business Affairs, Office of Post Award Administration Oregon State University |
Grant, Contract & Gift Accounting Manual
Section 100: General Administration of Award
Effective: 6/23/2008
Revised: 4/23/2012
To identify the process for submitting proposals.
All employees.
All OSU personnel seeking external funds for research, other sponsored activity, instructional enhancement, buildings or renovations should follow the proposal process.
All proposals for externally sponsored support that are subject to regulatory or sponsor restrictions and that involve a commitment of university resources must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate academic and administrative unit officials prior to submission to sponsors.
If external proposals are submitted without proper review and approval prior to submission, any resulting award acceptance is dependent upon completion of the standard internal approval process.
For administering these awards, use the Research Office website, the Grant, Contract & Gift Accounting Manual, and the policies of the sponsoring agency.
| Responsible Party | Action |
|
Business Center/ |
Prepares and submits to the Office of Sponsored Programs (a unit of the Research Office):
Responds to any questions from the agency concerning budget or scope of work. |
|
Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) |
Returns original signed proposal to Department/PI or submits electronically. |
| Department/PI |
|
| Office of Sponsored Programs |
|
Grant, Contract & Gift Accounting Manual
Section 100: General Administration of Award
Effective:
Revised: 4/23/2012
To identify the process for award approval & set up.
All employees.
If an award is received by an individual or an office other than Sponsored Programs, it should immediately be forwarded to the Office of Sponsored Programs for proper review, negotiation and acceptance on behalf of Oregon State University. No other OSU personnel have the authority to approve or sign any agreement committing OSU facilities or staff for sponsored activities. See GCG 101: Signature Authority- Proposals, Contracts, Financial Reporting.
| Responsible Party | Action |
|---|---|
|
Project Directors, Faculty, Deans, Department Heads and Principal Investigators |
|
|
Office of Sponsored Programs |
|
|
Business Affairs (Office of Post Award Administration) |
|
| Business Center Accountant |
|
To describe the processing of pre-award costs, budget changes and no-cost extensions for sponsored programs funded by various federal agencies. To identify the federal agencies who have granted OSU expanded authority.
Applies to grants and cooperative agreements, but does not apply to contracts. To determine whether an agreement is a grant, cooperative agreement, or a contract either of these banner screens can be used:
FTMFUND – if the predecessor fund ends in a five, it’s a contract.
FRAGRNT – if grant type box is “C”, it’s a contract. If grant type is a “G”, it’s a grant. If grant type is “A”, it’s a cooperative agreement.
Note: There are other grant types that are not covered under expanded authority.
Several federal agencies have adopted expanded authority policies that waive the normally required sponsor prior approval for specific actions. Expanded authority is intended to reduce overhead costs, increase research productivity, and reduce paperwork.
Expanded Authority
The authority granted to OSU that waives certain prior approval requirements by a federal sponsoring agency. Expanded authority is used only for changes that are necessary for the completion of the project within its original scope and original total budget.
Prior Approval Requirements
A Sponsoring Agency's requirement that the Agency approve changes prior to the change occurring.
ONR – Office of Naval Research (except no-cost extensions)
NASA – National Aeronautics & Space Administration
NSF – National Science Foundation
USDA/NIFA (formerly CSREES) Note: Expanded Authority has been delegated for NIFA (formerly CSREES) only, not all branches of USDA.)
NIH/PHS – National Institutes of Health/Public Health Service
NOAA/US Dept of Commerce – Nat’l. Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
Note: Expanded Authority has been delegated for NOAA only, not all branches of US-Dept. of Commerce. No rebudgeting direct for F&A or vice versa, unless noted in special terms and conditions.
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency
DOT - Department of Transportation
AID – Agency for International Development
A reallocation of budget line items may be requested. For agencies who have granted expanded authority, such changes are accomplished by a budget JV using journal type 1PBB - include proper justification in the text field; the Office of Post Award Administration (OPAA) must approve the JV.
Normally, expenditures may not be charged against sponsored programs before the effective date of a sponsored agreement. However, some federal agencies allow requests for pre-award expenditures to be reviewed and approved within OSU via expanded authority.
NSF, NASA, USDA-NIFA (formerly CSREES), NOAA, NIH/PHS, AID, ARO,DOE, DOT, EPA, US-ED and ONR: Approval may be granted for expenditure of funds up to 90 days prior to the expected start date of a new grant or cooperative agreement. Advance funding must be necessary for the effective and economical conduct of the project. Pre-award costs will not be approved unless a Department Head/Chair or a Dean/Director guarantees to reimburse the university in the event the grant or cooperative agreement is not received. Request pre-award costs using Pre-Award Cost form.
ALL OTHER AGENCIES OR SPONSORS: OSU is not authorized to approve pre-award costs for other agencies. However, it may be possible for OPAA to set up a “pending index” for awards anticipated to be funded, but for which the award document has not yet been received or fully executed. See GCG 105: Cost Accounting Standard Guidelines, #4 in Grants & Contracts section.
NSF, NASA, USDA-NIFA (formerly CSREES), NOAA, NIH/PHS, AID, ARO, DOE, DOT, EPA and US-ED: OSU, via expanded authority approve a one-time no-cost extension of up to one year beyond the original expiration date. The request must be submitted to OPAA at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of the project. OPAA must notify the agency at least 10 days prior to the expiration date of the project. Review of request will consider summary of progress, estimate of funds remaining, and plans for the completion of the project. Complete the OPAS/No-Cost Extension form and submit to the OPAA Grant Accountant responsible for the specific agency.
Examples of when such an extension may be requested are as follows:
Specific for: USDA - NIFA (formerly CSREES): up to a maximum potential award period not to exceed five years. The award period will commence as of the effective date cited in the grant; however, if OSU has elected to charge allowable pre-award costs under the grant, the award period will commence, for the purpose of determining the beginning of the maximum potential five year award period, on the date the first pre-award cost is incurred.
Specific for ONR: Complete the OPAS/No-Cost Extension form and forward to the OPAA Grant Accountant for review and processing. Upon approval, the Assistant Director of Business Affairs/OPAA will forward the request to ONR via e-mail.
No cost extensions cannot be processed under expanded authority if the award is past the end date. The OPAS/No-Cost Extension form must be completed and the request for extension must be made by the PI, in writing, on letterhead. The letter should be signed by the PI and include a blank line so that it can be countersigned by the Assistant Director of Business Affairs/OPAA. OPAA will forward to the sponsoring agency.
EXAMPLES OF CHANGES NOT COVERED UNDER EXPANDED AUTHORITY (written agency approval is required to do any of the following):
All persons associated with a sponsored project are responsible for knowing the applicable regulations, principles, standards and policies. These may include federal polices as well as sponsor, State of Oregon, Oregon University System (OUS), and Oregon State University (OSU) guidelines. These include, but are not limited to, the following:
This Circular establishes principles for determining costs applicable to grants, contracts, and other agreements with educational institutions. The principles deal with the subject of cost determination, and make no attempt to identify the circumstances or dictate the extent of agency and institutional participation in the financing of a particular project. The principles are designed to provide that the Federal Government bear its fair share of total costs, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, except where restricted or prohibited by law. Agencies are not expected to place additional restrictions on individual items of cost. See OMB Circular A-21 (Adobe .pdf document) on Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.
This Circular sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies in the administration of grants and cooperative agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations. For additional guidelines see OMB Circular A-110 on Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher Education
This Circular is issued pursuant to the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, and the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, P.L. 104-156. It sets forth standards for obtaining consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies for the audit of states, local governments, and non-profit organizations expending Federal awards. For additional guidelines see OMB Circular A-133 on Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations
The Federal Acquisition Regulations system is established for the codification and publication of uniform policies and procedures for acquisition by all executive agencies. FAR applies to contracts.
FASOM covers basic accounting principles of OUS and is now being integrated into the OUS Fiscal Policy manual.
The FIS Manual provides the user with policies and procedures applicable to accounting-related transactions at the university. The fiscal policies and procedures apply to all university departments.
The CASB was created by Congress to establish accounting rules and regulations. The Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Handbook may be obtained by contacting the Office of Post Award Administration at 737-4711. The CAS most applicable to OSU are:
CAS 501 – Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating, and Reporting Costs by Educational Institutions.
This standard requires that cost accounting practices used for estimating costs in proposals be consistent with the cost accounting practices used in accumulating (recording) and reporting costs. The standard is designed to provide a basis to compare proposal cost estimates with the actual costs. In its simplest terms, the standard requires that if costs are included in the project proposal, they must be accounted for as project costs; this includes cost sharing. When salaries are charged, effort reports must tie with accounting records (including any cost transfers), with proposal budgets, and with all progress reports to the sponsor.
CAS 502 – Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for the same Purpose by Educational Institutions.
This standard deals with consistency in accumulating like costs incurred for the same purpose. It requires that each type of cost be allocated only once, and on only one basis to any contract or other cost objective. The institution must identify which costs are charged (1) only as direct, (2) only as indirect, or (3) both as direct and indirect. In its simplest terms, the standard requires that cost coding must consistently identify like costs in like circumstances as always direct or always indirect. If a contract is charged directly for a cost, the same type of costs should not be in the F&A rate, and vice versa.
CAS 505 – Accounting for Unallowable Costs – Educational Institutions.
This standard contains guidelines on consistency in identifying unallowable costs and how they are treated within the cost accounting system. The standard does not provide additional guidance on what is unallowable; educational institutions will still follow OMB Circular A-21. In its simplest terms, the standard requires that costs expressly unallowable under OMB Circular A-21 or mutually agreed to be unallowable under terms of the agreement must be identified and excluded from any billing, claim, application, or proposal applicable to a sponsored agreement. Detailed records should establish and maintain visibility of identified unallowables, including allocation and cost accounting treatments.
CAS 506 – Cost Accounting Period – Educational Institutions.
This standard requires that the cost accounting period and all costing information (both direct and indirect) is based on the same period as the institution’s fiscal year. For OSU that period is July 1 to June 30.
See GCG 407: Reference Websites for specific agency information and other website references.
Persons in Oregon State University (OSU) departments who work with financial aspects of sponsored projects – principal investigators, project directors, accountants, and others.
All Funds:
Grants and Contracts:
All Funds:
Grants and Contracts: