Analysis:
Was the behavior unwelcome?
Yes, the student's reaction makes it clear the behavior is unwelcome.
... More
In a recent survey of college students the most common form of harassment reported by male students was being called a homophobic name. Using such language to tease or harass others is disrespectful of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered (LGBT) community. Same gender harassment and sexual orientation harassment are prohibited at OSU.
Was it sexual in nature or based on gender?
Subjecting someone to ridicule or mean treatment because she/he doesn’t conform to stereotyped notions of gender is conduct of a sexual nature. Such behavior could also be covered by OSU’s policy against discriminatory harassment
Was it explicitly or implicitly a condition of, or basis for, employment or academic decisions. (Was it a “quid pro quo” situation?)
No, not a quid pro quo situation.
Did it have the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with work or academic performance, or create a hostile, intimidating or offensive environment?
Whether the students intend to offend, their behavior clearly has that effect.
... More
Targeting someone for teasing and taunting about his perceived sexual orientation could create a hostile environment. It does not matter if he is gay. Other students should not leave unwelcome messages on his room and should not speculate about his sexual orientation.
Was the behavior severe or pervasive?
No, this behavior appears to be a one time event and does not rise to the level of severe behavior.
... More
It could make the recipient uncomfortable and should be addressed by staff in the residence hall. If the conduct persists so that it becomes pervasive, it could be considered harassment. Remember that one severe act or less serious but repeated acts can be harassment if the result is unreasonable interference with work or academic performance or the creation of a hostile environment.
