|

|
References
Ayn
Rand (1905-1982)
Excellent article by Stephen R. C. Hicks from the
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Philosophy:
Who Needs It?
Rand's Address To The Graduating Class Of
The United States Military Academy at West Point,
New York - March 6, 1974. An important text.
Introducing
Objectivism
A concise statement of Rand's Objectivist principles.
Most of this is statement without argument or evidence, but it is
certainly direct.
Playboy
Interview, 1964
Famous (notorious for some) statement of positions
by Rand.
Objectivism
Reference Center
An excellent collection of texts and resources on
Rand and Objectivist thinkers.
Francisco
d'Anconia's Money Speech
A key excerpt from Rand's most ambitious work, Atlas
Shrugged.
John
Galt's Speech
A key excerpt from Rand's most ambitious work, Atlas
Shrugged.
Ayn Rand:
About Her Life
Biography and interpretation from Libertarian and
Conservative perspectives from the Ayn Rand Institute.
What is Philosophy?
Leonard Peikoff is a foremost interpretor of Rand.
This is an excerpt from his book; "Objectivism: The Philosophy
of Ayn Rand."
An
Introduction to Objectivism
A video lecture by Leonard Peikoff (requires RealPlayer).
Egoism
The philosophical theory of self-interest explained
by Alex Moseley in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Egoism
An excellent article from Robert Shaver in the Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ayn
Rand Booklist
A listing of Rand's written works available from
Amazon.com and other venues.
|
|
Ayn
Rand
Few philosophers have fan clubs
and college student groups in their honor. Rand continues to inspire support
for (some of) her views and continual interest in her works. Perhaps it
is her personal passion and charisma that so effected those around her
that continues to impact us. Perhaps it is the expression of her ideas
in the form of novels, which make her ideas more accessible to the public
than abstract academic text. Possibly it is the fact that so little advanced
philosophical theory supports capitalism and self-interest, such that
Rand's Objectivism stands as a beacon for those seeking justification
for those approaches to society and morality. Whatever the basis Rand
is a philosopher with significant influence particularly on U.S.culture
(though there are Ayn Rand societies in Japan, Europe, and Russia).
It is ever critical to distinguish
between a philosopher and her/his interpretors. Rand is celebrated today
by many for her intellectual defense of capitalism and self-interest.
In her own time, however, Rand routinely denounced and criticized some
of the very commentators who cheered on her promotion of capitalism. In
particular, she resisted the movement of American social conservativism
that is based in Christianity. For instance:
| "I
consider National Review the worst and most dangerous magazine in
America. The kind of defense that it offers to capitalism results
in nothing except the discrediting and destruction of capitalism ...
because it ties capitalism to religion. The ideological position of
National Review amounts, in effect, to the following: In order to
accept freedom and capitalism, one has to believe in God or in some
form of religion, some form of supernatural mysticism. Which means
that there are no rational grounds on which one can defend capitalism.
Which amounts to an admission that reason is on the side of capitalism's
enemies, that a slave society or a dictatorship is a rational system,
and that only on the ground of mystic faith can one believe in freedom.
Nothing more derogatory to capitalism could ever be alleged, and the
exact opposite is true. Capitalism is the only system that can be
defended and validated by reason." (Playboy Interview; March
1964) |
The National Review is a traditional
fixture of the American right. Denouncing it's writers as ultimately anti-capitalist
was provocative the extreeme. Rand succeeded in alienating many conservatives
by her atheism and rejection of religion as the moral basis for humans.
Rather than faith, Rand insisted
that reason alone could form the basis of a coherent life. She meant this
in the most practical way for everyone. Rand held that the value of an
individual life was the supreme value, but that life only had value if
the individual was dedicated to a productive task and consciously guided
by rational principles. In effect, she held that the only free and morally
consistent human being is the philosopher - not the adacademic professional
or abstract dreamer, but the individual who takes personal responsibility
for their own beliefs.
"A philosophic system is an integrated view
of existence. As a human being, you have no choice about the fact
that you need a philosophy. Your only choice is whether you define
your philosophy by a conscious, rational, disciplined process of thought
and scrupulously logical deliberation -- or let your subconscious
accumulate a junk heap of unwarranted conclusions, false generalizations,
undefined contradictions, undigested slogans, unidentified wishes,
doubts and fears, thrown together by chance, but integrated by your
subconscious into a kind of mongrel philosophy and fused into a single,
solid weight: self-doubt, like a ball and chain in the place where
your mind's wings should have grown."
(Ayn Rand, Philosophy: Who Needs It?; 1974) |
|
|