Dunn, R. (1997). The Goals and Track Record of Multicultural Education. Educational Leadership, 54, 74-78. 


I chose to read this article because it challenges the importance of multicultural education! I was doing further research on multicultural education so that I can better implement this in my future classroom. This article argues that multicultural education should not separate students from one another. Instead teachers should satisfy the educational needs of each student in the same setting. Rita Dunn claims that several programs that have been created to address cultural difference are deficient.
She includes programs that promote bicultural approaches and monocultural approaches to education. She claims that the key is to pay attention to the varied learning styles of all students and my doing so the goals of multicultural education can be achieved.
Some programs emphasize pluralism, cultural equity, increased racial tolerance, or multilingualism. Dunn believes that these focuses are mostly political rather than educational or social. Dunn has found in her research that it isn't necessarily the content that is taught, but rather how it is taught that will make a difference. Students who aren't high achievers (from other cultures or from the dominant U.S. culture) learn differently than those who are high achievers. In conclusion, this article stresses that high achievement is possible without curriculum modifications based strictly on various cultural differences. Instead the focus of curriculum change should be based on the different cultural learning styles. Dunn believes that the melting pot doesn't diminish one's heritage, but rather creates a blend of the best characteristics of all cultures.

Questions for the Author

1)   How exactly is multicultural education mostly political? Don't you
think there are benefits that extend beyond the political arena?
2)   From what I have learned doing my research multicultural education in a
sense includes paying attention to learning styles of learners. You have stated that the opposite is true. Are their studies that you have looked at that show that focusing on learning styles will accomplish multicultural education? If so, explain.
3)   Do you believe in James Banks five dimensions of multicultural education? These include more than changing just the material presented in class. These dimensions promote changing teaching methods to address all students equally. Isn't this addressing students as individuals by modifying the structure of the classroom for all?
4)   What suggestions do you have for teachers about meeting the learning styles of all children? How do you feel a teacher should go about recognizing individuals needs and managing to make the necessary changes without taking away from the class as a whole?
5)   Even thought high achievement can be possible without changing the material presented in class, isn't there more to focus on besides academic achievement? Do you agree that there is a necessity for multicultural education in order to reduce social problems such as racism, ageism, sexism, etc.?

Alyssa Cherbas
 
 
 
 


Return to Bibliography Page