Third
Parties and Managing Conflicts:
Some
Fundamentals of Conflict and Mediation
A COMM 444/544 presentation
Gregg Walker, Ph.D., Professor
What is Conflict? Common Images
of Conflict (Metaphors)
-
Conflict as . . . a war
-
Conflict as . . . a mess
-
Conflict as . . . a game
-
Conflict as . . . a dance
-
Conflict as . . . a puzzle
-
Conflict as . . . an adventure
What is Conflict? Conflict involves . .
.
-
Incompatibility
-
Interdependent parties
-
Interests, goals, aspirations
-
Incentives to cooperate and compete
-
Interaction; communication
-
Bargaining/negotiation
-
Strategy
Where do Conflicts Occur?
Conflicts are Situational
They occur on many levels:
e.g., interpersonal, group, intercultural
Conflicts occur
in many settings:
e.g., natural resource, business, legal
Conflicts occur
on many scales:
e.g., community, national, international
What are Conflicts About? Three Dimensions
-
Substantive Dimension: The “concrete” content
of a conflict.
-
Procedural Dimension: The processes used to
make decisions; the rules that govern interaction.
-
Relationship Dimension: Matters pertaining
to the relations between parties, such as power, legitimacy, and face.
What is Conflict Management About? The
Progress Triangle
Substance
Procedure
Relationship
What are Conflicts about? Sources of
Incompatibility
-
Facts
-
Values
-
Interests
-
Jurisdiction
-
Personal styles
-
Culture
-
History
Who do Conflicts Involve?
-
Two or more primary parties
-
Interested secondary parties
-
People as representatives
-
Possible media attention
-
Third parties? . . . perhaps
Responding to Conflicts
When parties are faced with a conflict,
they often respond by:
-
Avoidance (Inaction and Withdrawal)
-
Accommodation (Yielding)
-
Competition (Win-Lose)
-
Collaboration (Problem-Solve)
Responding to Conflicts, continued
-
Avoidance and Accommodation are
-
considered PASSIVE responses.
-
Collaboration and Competition are considered
ACTIVE responses.
-
Conflict responses and strategies reflect
dual concerns.
Conflict Responses & Strategies Reflect
Dual Concerns
High
Competition Collaboration
Concern
for Self
Low Inaction
Accommodation
Low
High
Concern for Other
Comparing Collaborative and Competitive
Strategies
Factor
Collaborative
Competitive
Goal
Mutual Gain
Self Benefit
Resource View Expandable
Fixed-Pie
Relationship
Valued
Unimportant
View of Other
Partner
Adversary
Communication Open
Controlled
Trust
High
Limited
Power
Shared
Coveted
CHARACTERISTICS OF A NEGOTIABLE CONFLICT
SITUATION
-
TWO OR MORE PARTIES
-
INCOMPATIBLE INTERESTS
-
VOLUNTARY RELATIONSHIP
-
INTERDEPENDENCE
-
MIXED MOTIVE
CHARACTERISTICS OF A NEGOTIABLE CONFLICT
SITUATION
-
EXCHANGE OF RESOURCES or RECONCILIATION OF
ISSUES
-
FLUID PREFERENCES
-
SEQUENTIAL ACTIVITY
-
JOINT DECISION-MAKING
-
DECISION AMONG ALTERNATIVES (BATNA)
Building the Collaborative Relationship:
Key Process Factors
-
Interact and negotiate rationally
-
Commit to learn and understand
-
Value disagreement
-
Keep the door open
-
Take stock and monitor the situation
Building the Collaborative Relationship:
Person Factors
-
Credibility and integrity
-
Trust and reliability
-
Acceptance and respect
Building Collaborative Substance: Distributive
Justice Concerns
-
How will resources be distributed?
-
What distributive norms apply?
Building Collaborative Substance: Distributive
Justice Norms
-
EQUITY - based on contribution
-
EQUALITY - all parties share equally
-
COMPENSATION - based on need
-
SUBSTRACTION - share the pain
Building Collaborative Procedure: Procedural
Justice Concerns
-
Ownership
-
Decision Space
-
Inclusiveness
-
Incentives
-
Fairness
-
Alternatives
Third Party Roles and Conflict and Dispute
Situations
-
As a member of a coalition
-
As an observer
-
As a mediator
-
As a facilitator
-
As an arbitrator
-
As a fact-finder or analyst
-
As a process consultant or conciliator
-
As a counselor
Third Party Roles and Conflict and Dispute
Situations
-
Which roles are impartial?
-
Which roles make substantive decisions and
sign agreements?
-
Which roles promote collaborative or mutual
gain negotiation?
-
Which roles analyze both the parties and the
problems?
Third Party Roles and Conflict and Dispute
Situations
Two roles promote collaborative or mutual
gain negotiation:
Defining Mediation
Mediation is an interactive communication
process for negotiating conflict situations in which an impartial third
party helps the disputants attempt to reach a mutual gains agreement.
Defining Mediation
Mediation is an informal process in which
a neutral third party with no power to impose a resolution helps the disputing
parties try to reach a mutually acceptable settlement.
-- Baruch Bush & Folger, The Promise
of Mediation
What is Facilitation?
An impartial “third” party provides procedural
guidance to group participants to promote constructive communication, information
exchange, learning, and collaborative negotiation.
The facilitator could be a member of the
discussion group, but needs to play only the facilitator role (wear only
one hat).
Facilitation vs. Mediation
-
Facilitation and mediation are sibling processes.
They feature many of the same features and skills.
-
Facilitation focuses on the process so that
parties can work together well. Reaching agreement is not a
primary goal.
-
Mediation also emphasizes process, but agreement
is a primary goal.
Key Features of Mediation
-
It is a non-adversarial process.
The mediator is committed to neutrality and impartiality to the greatest
extent possible.
-
The mediator must put aside self-interest.
The mediator must avoid a pre-determined point of view.
Key Features of Mediation
-
Although mediation may be imposed on disputants,
mediation is most effective as a voluntary process. Mediation
functions best when parties choose mediation and see mediation as a reasonable
alternative to other means for dealing with the conflict.
-
The disputants reconcile their own differences.
They determine the appropriate settlement as a result of joint decision-making.
The mediator does not force advice or solutions on the disputants.
Key Features of Mediation
-
The mediator promotes a collaborative
negotiation (integrative, mutual gains) process that emphasizes constructive
communication interaction.
-
Mediators are advocates for the process of
mediation rather than advocates for either party.