Overview of Current Training Programs and Courses for Fisheries Managers

compiled for the

Training Managers for 21st Century Fisheries
Workshop held in Queenstown, NZ, December 4-7, 2001


prepared by

Laura W. Jodice 
Marine Resource Management
College of Oceanic & Atmospheric Sciences
Oregon State University
jodicel@yahoo.com 

Gil Sylvia
Coastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station
Hatfield Marine Science Center
Oregon State University
Gil.Sylvia@oregonstate.edu

November 23, 2001

Introduction 

This report is an annotated web index designed to help workshop participants learn about fishery management training programs as well as other programs that may serve as useful models for "training managers." 

Given the increasing complexity of fisheries management, we assume the type of training necessary for 21st Century managers requires education beyond undergraduate or postsecondary training.  This assumption is substantiated by several previous fisheries education workshops and conference sessions held in the US over the past 30 years (see Timeline of fisheries education workshops/conferences).  This previous work indicates that while many undergraduate fisheries programs have developed integrated curriculum to help students gain management skills, graduates of a 4 year undergraduate program are generally not prepared to make effective decisions or take leadership roles.  

Two types of graduate or postgraduate level training ARE highlighted in this report - academic/university based graduate training (postgraduate diploma or certificate, Masters, or PhD) and continuing professional education. Some significant examples of undergraduate training are included.   

Defining Fisheries Management Training

To guide our review and selection of programs included in this index, we developed a preliminary list of the skills and knowledge that might be necessary for a fisheries manager. To develop this list, we thought it would be helpful to have an understanding of what past educators, trainers, and employers have described as necessary components of fisheries management education. Based on a review of literature on fisheries and natural resource education (see Bibliography), we developed the following comprehensive list:

Fisheries Science Core Curriculum
Fishery biology
- fish physiology, routine analysis of fish, anatomy/morphology of fish, taxonomy, diseases/parasites, nutrition, toxicology, genetics, evolution
Population dynamics
-life history, movement/distribution of fishes
Stock assessment
– biometrics, impact of fishing on fish populations
Aquaculture & Fish Culture
- principles and operation, reproduction
Fish ecology
- community ecology, environmental & habitat requirements 
Fishing technology
- capture & sampling methods; commercial fishing technology
Aquatic Science
- oceanography, stream ecology, limnology, watershed science
Math - statistics, calculus

Management Curriculum
Fishery management
- principles/procedures, nongame or endangered species, management and restoration techniques, general concepts of natural resource management, habitat management, design, implementation, and evaluation of fisheries management programs
Policy
- Laws and regulations, policy analysis (marine, ocean, fishery)
Public Administration
- includes government operations and policy analysis
Economics
- fisheries or natural resources
Decision science - e.g. systems science, management science

Business
- e.g. marketing, consumer behavior, budget/financial management
Sociology/Anthropology
- human behavior
Ethics or Philosophy –
objective science, equitable decision-making

Skill Areas for Fisheries Management
Risk/impact assessment
Experimental design and statistical sampling procedures
Surveying and monitoring of biological populations
Geographical Skills - GPS, GIS, photo interpretation etc.
Budget preparation and management
Employee supervision and management
Team work
Strategic planning
Problem Solving
Decision-making
Systems thinking
Policy analysis
Critical thinking
Conflict resolution/facilitation
Public speaking
Technical writing
Public relations

Second, we attempted to develop a definition of a "fisheries manager." This lead to a realization that the definition of fisheries manager depends on the institutional structure of the management process. We proceeded to develop a more conceptualized definition of the fisheries manager:

1) Is a fisheries manager a specialist or generalist?  Figure 1 demonstrates this spectrum and the potential role played by the "manager". 

2) Fisheries managers fill different management niches and have different levels of responsibility.  The fisheries manager may have primary responsibility for mid-level management, where he or she makes decisions about implementation of policy and regulations.  A high level manager would have responsibility for leading change in management institutions, evaluating policy outcomes, developing adaptive response, and designing strategic plans. This is illustrated in Figure 2.

3) The fisheries manager's role depends on the institutional management model. There are a range of institutional models including :

    • Scientific centralized management – a scientifically trained federal manager makes management decisions for national or regional fisheries
    • Pluralistic management - resources are federally owned but regionally appointed representatives develop management policies -- significant public participation
    • Rights-based - owners of user rights/property rights charged with management responsibilities subject to regional and federal oversight

4) The fisheries manager's role also varies depending on whether the position is within government, private industry, or a non-profit or other NGO.  However, because fishery stocks are publicaly owned, management is often a public process. Fishery managers, or those who significantly influence management decisions, may represent all three sectors within the same decision making process.

    • Public sector managers traditionally focus on biologically oriented objectives and broad public and legal mandates including sustainability and maximizing regional or national welfare.
    • Private sector fishery managers are charged with meeting objectives of private industry organizations including maximizing profits or quota value, improving stability, obtaining user rights/privileges, and meeting regulatory requirements.
    • Non profit-based fishery managers typically pursue environmentally related objectives including stock preservation, habitat protection, and ecosystem management.
    • Regardless of the sector, the fishery manager is often responsible for internal management of the organization including staff and budgets.

The knowledge and skills necessary for a successful fisheries manager will vary depending on the type of management system, their role within the system, and their sector orientation. No single fishery management program can be expected to provide all the necessary knowledge, skills, or expertise. Therefore, in this report we provide information on a wide variety of training programs that may potentially serve to train managers for 21st century fisheries.


What is included in this index?

We focused on primarily on providing information on = fisheries programs that specified some management component and/or marine orientation(in fact most examples are fisheries science programs with some amount of management coursework or research emphasis) and therefore excluded some programs that are purely fisheries science or primarily focused on inland recreational fisheries management. In addition, we have included a variety of marine resource management programs and other natural resource management programs with potential for a fisheries concentration or emphasis. All of these programs are listed under: Academic Programs in Fisheries.

We have also listed several other marine, natural resource, or environmental management programs, such as forestry, which may serve as valuable examples for comparison, particularly because some of these illustrate programmatic choices and curricular objectives and principles that we believe are useful to the workshop discussion.  These are listed under: Academic programs in other natural resources.

We provide a list of other top management (e.g. business) or public administration/affairs programs that provide prime examples of how management training could be found in disciplines outside natural resource management. Most of these programs appeared on a list of top management programs with some environmental management emphasis (see: Lists of programs). These are listed under: Academic programs in other management related disciplines.

We provide a list of continuing education programs in fisheries, as well as other natural resource disciplines and some other management disciplines, which may be more useful for mid level and upper level managers. These are listed under: Professional/Inservice/Continuing Ed

For each of these lists, we have attempted to highlight unique examples, for the purpose of illustrating alternative models or special features that demonstrate the range of training. These significant examples are listed as part of the index at the top of each list. We suggest reviewing these highlighted examples first.

Guidance for your review

As you review these examples, you may want to consider the following questions: 

  • What type of manager is the program intending to train? Is the program training a manager or a scientist? Where will the graduate fit within your institutional setting?

  • Does the program have a clearly  stated mission or objectives? - consider whether the program's goals fits the goals inherent in the possible of training managers for 21st century fisheries. 

  • In many of these programs, it appears the mission may be loftier than the what the program may be able to accomplish. Does the curriculum (e.g. courses, capstone opportunities) reflect the mission?

  • Is this a strong program?  Is it independent with lots of faculty and coursework specific to fisheries and fisheries management?  Or, does it rely on the strengths of other departments of faculties of the university? Are there actually students in the program or is the program descriptin outdated? 

  • Does the program have the flexibility to adapt to the future training of managers?

  • Does the program require students to synthesize material through a capstone course or project, or other opportunities?

  • Are there any interesting or unique features of the program that might be key components to future training programs? 

We will highlight specific and significant features of programs in our presentation at the workshop. This portion will eventually be included in our final report.

Methods used to compile lists

All fisheries training and education programs were found through a thorough web search, using search engines such as google.com as well as lists from the following websites:

Additional lists were reveiwed (see Lists of programs), but many of these lists included the same information.

Analysis

We are presently performing a qualitative analysis aimed at summarizing common and unique characteristics of the range of training programs available.  For this analysis we are evaluating the fisheries training programs listed under: Academic Programs in FisheriesEach fisheries program is being entered into an Access database, which will hopefully later be available for workshop participants.  For each database entry, we are summarizing information about each program (related to the guiding questions listed above), including:

  • Mission statement/goals/objectives - What are the principles guiding the program?; Do these statement include certain key words (such as leadership, sustainable, conflict resolution, critical thinking, etc.)  
  • Organization - Where is the institution located within the university?
  • Disciplinary foundation - e.g. oceanography, fisheries science, marine policy
  • Degree title, description (e.g. masters, Phd, certificate, diploma), and level that fisheries occurs (e.g. major, minor, concentration, research emphasis)
  • Curriculum - flexibility, % science, % "management"
  • Capstone opportunities - e.g. thesis, integrated or synthetic course, team project, international opportunity
  • Response to specialist/generalist (breadth vs. depth)
  • Is it a professional or research program, or both?
  • Program independence - what % of the courses and faculty are dependent on other departments or disciplines
  • Proximity or access to marine lab, and/or fishing industry
  • Partnerships with industry, government, and NGOs; and international partnerships

This information will be summarized and provided as part of our workshop presentation, and then become part of our final report. <see: Link to Current Training Summary paper (MS WORD 2000)(PDF)>

uGo to the Main Index