skip page navigationOregon State University
OSU Home.|Calendar.|Find Someone.|Maps.|Site Index.

Faculty Senate

Faculty Senate » January 17, 2007, Minutes

Baccalaureate Core Committee

January 17, 2007
Minutes

Members present: All present (including Vicki Tolar-Burton, ex officio) except Margie Haak (gave advance notice)

Old Business:
  1. Minutes from December 7, 2006 meeting APPROVED

  2. Message from Vickie Nunnemaker - STS category review in process with some delays; should go out soon. BCC discussed shortening the revision period to as little as one month so that we still have time for appropriate review.
    ACTION: Pat to relay this plan to Vickie
           NOTE SINCE MEETING: Revision requests have gone out; some departments have requested delays for a year, and some courses are no longer offered; our list is shrinking; Pat has reworked the matrix for reviews to reflect this and balance BCC workloads.

  3. Memo to winter-term BCC Instructors - Jay solved some issues, compiled a list, and distributed the memo intended to prompt instructors to identify with and discuss BC purposes with their students. Jay and Pat received good feedback about this reminder but at a significant time cost. Though that cost could be reduced in the future, a better approach may be to distribute to Academic Chairs to be forwarded to their instructors. In addition, we can/will provide verbiage (currently in editing) for syllabi.
    ACTION: Jay to revise verbiage and distribute before spring term

  4. Course updates: ANTH487 is no longer a CGI (REQUEST FOR REMOVAL FORM COMPLETED); GEO300X is now GEO390 (APPROVAL SUBMITTED); H120 has met our requirements and Pat recommends approval (APPROVAL SUBMITTED)
New Business:
  1. Faculty Senate "deliberations" on BC: (Based on partial attendance by Vicki Tolar-Burton with notes from early part of Senate meeting). It appears that most concern in the Senate is over pedagogy in courses (e.g., student engagement) rather than structure/delivery of the current BC program, though there was vague talk of "other models" and "objectives and evaluation criteria." There were no motions or actions taken. Three groups will likely be considering aspects of the BCC over the coming year: UCSEE, Assessment Council, and Undergraduate Education Council. Items #6 and #8 below may pro-actively alleviate some concerns in these three groups.
    ACTION: Jay and Pat to continue tracking the work of these three groups

  2. Moving to more than 3 credits for BC courses: (Becky Warner, Tracy Daugherty and Michael Oriard visiting). Departments are considering this move for their own curricula as well as BC courses to encourage: a) engagement of students and other related pedagogical issues related to pace of instruction, and b) better alignment with other universities for transferring credits. However, there are tough logistical issues involved that are made worse by current budgetary times (e.g., loss of positions, use of adjuncts and lecturers, and general lack of course offerings). The BCC feels that we have to move to be more flexible and work with departments, which probably translates into a "minimum core credits" approach by category with a reduced number of categories so the total remains at 48 credits (51 including WIC). This new flexibility and reduced categories relates well to the "outcomes" discussion (#8 below).
    ACTION: Jay to continue work on outcomes; BCC to brainstorm on this new structure at next special meeting (AGENDA)

  3. GEO352: approval confirmed from earlier email (APPROVED)

  4. New "outcomes language" for BC: Jay has been processing the current wording of BC categories into outcome language and is realizing the similarities among many categories. We also have parallel concerns that the sum of good pieces does not necessarily translate to a good whole.
    ACTION: Jay to continue revisions including consultations with Peter Saunders (CTL) and Rebecca Sanderson (NSSE); BCC to review at the next special meeting as related to #6 above (AGENDA)

  5. Jay drafted a paragraph intended to describe the overall purpose for and vision of the Bacc Core curriculum, which, when finalized, will be inserted into the Schedule of Classes. Two members had already submitted comments on the draft text; others are asked to review the draft and bring comments to the next meeting (AGENDA)

Next meeting: January 31, 2007 9:00-11:00 in Gilkey 109; three agenda items flagged above.

Minutes submitted by John Bailey