
Revised March, 2000
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE:
To implement a continually developing program of Integrated Fruit Production (IFP), including growing, packing and marketing pome fruit from the Mid-Columbia region. To emphasize maintaining the economic health of the industry while using ecologically sound production methods. This program, through the Hood River Grower-Shipper Association, will be implemented by industry education and include cooperation with similar programs from other regions or entities.
1. DEFINITION OF INTEGRATED
PRODUCTION OF POME FRUITS
Integrated
Fruit Production (IFP) is defined as the economical production of high quality
fruit which gives priority to ecologically sound methods, minimizes side effects
and use of agricultural chemicals, thereby protecting the environment and human
health.
2. PROFESSIONALLY
TRAINED, ENVIRONMENTALLY AND SAFETY CONSCIOUS GROWERS
Managers
of an IFP system need to be trained and have a thorough understanding of the
program, both its aims and principles. Training can be obtained by attending
organized courses, reading publications and viewing demonstration plots. Managers
have to recognize that the main thrust of the program is economic production
of high quality fruit while choosing practices that are safe and ecologically
compatible with our environment.
3. SITE, ROOTSTOCKS,
CULTIVAR AND PLANTING SYSTEM FOR NEW ORCHARDS
For
new orchards, site, rootstocks, cultivar and planting system must be selected
and harmonized so that regular yields of quality fruit, and hence economic success,
can be achieved with the minimum use of agricultural chemicals and environmentally
hazardous practices. Chemical soil sterilization is allowed since there are
currently no viable alternatives. Sites with a favorable aspect and good soils
have fewer inputs. Therefore, frost pockets, poor drainage and shallow non-moisture
retentive soils should be avoided. The cultivar chosen must offer good prospects
for economic success with minimal use of agricultural chemicals. Cultivars
resistant to diseases and/or pests are preferred. Planting material should
be sound and certified virus free. Planting systems may be single or multi-rows,
but single rows are preferred. Small trees of uniform size are the aim for
the future so that safer, more efficient spraying practices can be adopted.
Planting distances should allow enough space for the tree throughout its expected
life span without severe pruning.
4. SOIL MANAGEMENT
AND TREE NUTRITION
The
structure, depth, fertility and micro-flora of the soil must be conserved and
nutrients and organic matter recycled where possible. Minimum quantities of
fertilizers consistent with high yields of quality fruit may be used only when
chemical analysis of soil or plant material shows they are justified. Risk
of polluting ground and surface water with fertilizers, especially nitrates,
must be minimized.
Soil must be sampled and chemically analyzed prior to planting. For
new orchards, the pH should be corrected before planting. After planting, plant
and soil analyses including pH must be done regularly on a site specific basis
to determine nutrient and fertilizer needs. Records of soil and plant analyses
and all nutrient applications should be kept. Timing and rates of fertilizer
applications should correspond to plant requirements.
To reduce compaction, avoid driving heavy equipment over saturated soils.
Avoid cultivation practices that induce compaction and/or erosion. Allow organic
matter to remain in the tree row when possible since organic matter helps improve
soil structure. On sloped land, maintain adequate groundcover throughout the
orchard to avoid erosion.
5. ALLEYWAYS
AND WEED-FREE STRIPS
The
aims are to maintain plant species diversity in the orchard to promote ecological
stability, to minimize the use of herbicides and to avoid soil erosion and compaction
in the alleyways. Because of potential soil erosion, orchards with bare soil
are not recommended. Herbicide application should be made in strips covering
not more than 30% of the orchard floor. It is not necessary to maintain completely
weed free strips in the tree row. It is recommended that, where possible, groundcover
is allowed to develop in the weed free strip at times of the year when soil
moisture is adequate. Rotation of herbicides and reduction of total amount
of residual herbicides is recommended after strip establishment. Use materials
with minimum leaching potential. Mechanical methods of weed control or mulching
systems are encouraged.
6. IRRIGATION
Trees
must be supplied with adequate soil moisture to ensure balanced growth and ensure
high internal and external fruit quality. Excessive soil moisture may result
in poor fruit quality, leaching of nutrients and increased risk of root rot.
Irrigation must be applied according to need. Need will be established by monitoring
soil moisture levels at rooting depths, evapotranspiration rates for the area,
and daily rain fall amounts. Irrigation water must be supplied according to
the soil moisture deficit, the water storing capacity of the soil, and infiltration
rates.
7. ORCHARD
HEATING
Orchard
heating systems should be chosen with the goals of minimizing air, soil, and
water pollution, and maximizing energy conservation. Where possible, under-tree
and overhead irrigation should be considered as a supplemental heating system.
However, potential problems related to excessive water use, such as soil compaction,
nitrogen leaching, and disease must be examined when using water as a heat source.
The use of frost fans is encouraged as another clean and effective method of
orchard heating. Choosing propane rather than diesel as an energy source can
minimize the potential for air, soil and water pollution.
Bioremediation products are recommended to minimize the impact of heating fuel
spills to the soil ecosystem. Enzymes and bacterial microbes in these products
accelerate the break down of petroleum products in the soil.
8. TREE TRAINING
AND MANAGEMENT
Trees
should be managed to achieve a balance between growth and yield. It is important
to have good light penetration to maintain productivity in the lower portions
of trees and to produce high quality fruit. Properly managed trees also help
in providing good spray penetration thereby increasing efficiency and efficacy
of protective spray materials. Excessive growth should be controlled by cultural
methods such as reducing fertilizer, deficit irrigation, allowing competition
of orchard floor cover and/or by summer pruning.
9. FRUIT MANAGEMENT
Where
excessive numbers of flowers have pollinated and set during bloom and an excessive
crop is likely to result, the young fruitlets must be thinned shortly after
bloom to the optimum number to ensure adequate fruit size and quality. Hand
thinning is preferred. Registered chemical thinning agents are permitted on
varieties where their use is required for economic production.
10. INTEGRATED
PLANT PROTECTION
Priority
should be given to biological, cultural, genetic and biotechnical methods of
pest, disease and weed control. The use of agricultural chemicals especially
of those with broadspectrum activity should be minimized. Plant protection
products may only be used when justified e.g. when pest populations have exceeded
economic threshold levels. The least disruptive product which is effective
against the target pest should be selected. Products used will be chosen for
their efficacy and ecological benefits while minimizing residues. Products
which meet these criteria are identified in the IFP guidelines.
Whenever additional control measures are deemed necessary, preference
should be given to alternatives to chemical pesticides if available and effective,
including biological, cultural, genetic and biotechnical control methods (e.g.
pheromone mating disruption for codling moth and other tortricid pests, granulosis
virus for codling moth control, Bacillus thuringiensis for leafrollers
and noctuid caterpillars, mass trapping of shothole borers etc.).
Biological control is an alternative to chemical plant protection products
and can contribute significantly to the control of several tree fruit pests
(e.g. spider mites, pear psylla, leafminer, aphids, white apple leafhopper).
The aim of an IFP program is to integrate biological control by creating an
orchard environment in which natural enemies can survive and be effective.
Populations of key natural enemies (e.g. predatory mites on apple or predatory
plant bugs on pear) should be preserved. Natural enemies (e.g. predatory mites)
should be introduced into apple and pear orchards where they are absent. Populations
of insect-eating birds as well as bats should be encouraged by installing nesting
boxes or bat houses in or near orchards.
Orchard sanitation should be practiced to remove overwintering sources
of infestation or infection (e.g. fireblight- or canker-infected wood, shothole
borer-infested branches).
Horticultural practices (e.g. fertilization, irrigation) should be adjusted
to avoid excessive vigor which increases the susceptibility of trees to pests
and diseases. Summer pruning and removal of water sprouts should be encouraged
to deprive leaf feeders (e.g. pear psylla, aphids) of a preferred food source
and thus reduce their population levels.
Populations of insects, mites, vertebrate pests, diseases and weeds should
be regularly monitored and recorded. Scientifically established assessment
methods as outlined in the Orchard Pest Management Handbook (available
from Good Fruit Grower, Yakima, WA) and similar publications (e.g. Orchard
Pest Monitoring Guide for Pears, also available from Good Fruit Grower)
should be consulted. For each pest or disease the level of infestation or risk
of infection should be estimated. The decisions as to whether or not a treatment
is required should take into account the pest levels, the established economic
injury thresholds, the levels of natural enemies, and the weather conditions.
Information about the ground cover such as weed species present, their growth
stage, distribution and abundance, should also be taken and recorded.
Pesticides
available locally or nationally which meet the criteria established by the IFP
program must be identified on a list of products in the IFP guidelines.
The
following criteria will be taken into account in placing pesticides into most
preferred #1, preferred #2, and permitted #3 classifications (see appendix
A).
Not in weighted order :
| 1. Leaching Potential | The tendency of a chemical to move in solution with water and leach below the root zone into ground water |
| 2. Soil Sorption | The tendency of a chemical to be strongly attached to soil particle surfaces and not leach into the ground water. |
| 3. Toxicity | How much active ingredient does it take to kill 50% of a laboratory rat population through dermal exposure. |
| 4. Efficacy | The effectiveness of a chemical. How a chemical compares with all other options in relation to getting the job done. |
| 5. Pre-harvest Interval | The minimum time required to pass between the last spray application and the acutal harvest. Directly related to residues. |
| 6. Soil Half-life | The amount of time measured in hours or days it takes for 1/2 of the total amount of active ingredient to breakdown. This factor is dependent on moisture, temperature, oxygen, and microbial populations. |
| 7. Effect on Beneficials | The effect of the chemical (both negative or positive) on an existing population of beneficial insects. |
| 8. Biological Disruption | The use of a specific chemical could interfere with potential predators and beneficials. The use of this chemical will necessitate using additional sprays due to its disruptive nature. |
Residue levels on fruit at harvest must not exceed maximum tolerances established by the EPA. Preferably, longer than legally required day-to-harvest intervals should be used to minimize residue on fruit at harvest as much as possible. Growers should use the lowest effective rate to minimize residue.
11. EFFICIENT AND SAFE SPRAY
APPLICATION METHODS
One
aim of IFP is to reduce the use of agricultural chemicals by applying them as
efficiently as possible. Therefore, sprayers must be regularly serviced and
calibrated. In addition, sprayer output should be matched to the size and shape
of the tree. The volume of canopy (tree-row volume) to be sprayed must be taken
into account to avoid spraying too much or too little.
Growers
are strongly urged to adopt strategies that reduce chemical drift. Spraying
in windy conditions should be avoided. Spraying small droplet sizes should
be avoided unless using sprayer technology that reduces drift (tower sprayers,
air curtain sprayers, etc.). Always turn nozzles off at the end of a row.
Where possible, spray only the outside two rows towards the interior of an orchard
while driving at a slower speed to improve coverage.
All
possible efforts should be made to reduce the impact of pesticide application
on surface and ground water quality. Loading/mixing/cleaning facilities should
be located in an area where run-off cannot carry pesticides into sensitive areas
(streams, creeks, and rivers). Diluted rinse waters from cleaning sprayers
should be recycled by applying back into the orchard. When cleaning the interior
of the spray tank, it is suggested that the entire tank be filled with clean
water (300-500 gallons) and this dilute solution applied back into the orchard.
Maintain a buffer of vegetation between the orchard and flowing water.
IFP
growers are encouraged to select spray systems which operate most efficiently
for their orchard plantings. When planting systems for new orchards are chosen
they should be compatible with safer, more efficient spraying methods.
12. POSTHARVEST TREATMENTS
This
district is committed to supplying high quality fruit for the entire marketing
season. This challenge of maintaining fruit quality for 8-10 months is made
possible through many different factors. These include use of different storage
regimes, optimizing fruit nutrient levels, good orchard sanitation, disease
prevention programs, harvesting a clean and damage-free crop, use of clean bins
and equipment, and use of postharvest products to minimize fruit degradation
during storage. Products used will be chosen for their efficacy and ecological
benefits while minimizing residues. As new technology is developed, its incorporation
into fruit quality maintenance programs will help in our efforts to deliver
a better product over an extending market.
13. HARVESTING,
STORAGE AND FRUIT QUALITY
Fruit
must be harvested at the correct time according to the cultivar and for the
purpose intended. Storage methods must be such as to maintain high internal
and external fruit quality. Storage and refrigeration equipment must be maintained
to ensure maximum efficiency and must be regularly monitored to ensure correct
operating conditions. Wherever possible, fruit in storage should be regularly
monitored for external and internal condition and firmness.
14. ACCREDITATION
An
IFP system should be recognizable and be different from a conventional program
while knowing that both are legal and responsible. The Hood River District
IFP Program will track changes in pesticide use through a standardized spray
recording system. This system will be used for research, to generate information
about chemical usage and to determine progress toward our stated goals.
At
this time, the Hood River District IFP Program does not have a certification
program for individual growers and orchard operations. However, growers can
obtain certification through a third party organization such as The Food Alliance.
(TFA). Contact the Hood River Grover-Shipper Association office for more information
about The Food Alliance and its certification program.
15. LABELING
Fruit
from Hood River District will be identified on the box or on the fruit by a
distinctive logo or label. The TFA and the Hood River District IFP labels will
identify fruit from growers certified by The Food Alliance.