Weed Control and Potato Variety Tolerance to Herbicides

Corey V. Ransom and Joey Ishida
Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Ontario, OR, 1998

Summary

Trials conducted in 1998 determined that tank mixtures of Sonalan with registered herbicides continue to provide effective weed control and high tuber yields. Evaluations of sulfentrazone demonstrated that it did not injure Russet Burbank, Shepody, and Umatilla potato varieties and that sulfentrazone treatments provided exceptional control of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and hairy nightshade. A tolerance trial demonstrated that BAS 656 07 H was safe on Shepody potatoes at the standard rate. Various combinations of registered herbicides and combinations of BAS 656 07 H with Sencor and Matrix were shown to provide effective weed control, which increased potato yields.

Introduction

Weed control in potatoes is critical to maximize yield and tuber quality. While effective weed control is important, herbicide injury can reduce potato yield and quality. Rotational crop restrictions and potato varieties that are sensitive to Sencor and Lexone limit the herbicide products available for weed control in potatoes. New herbicides may provide effective weed control in potatoes without injury to the crop. Trials were established at the Malheur Experiment Station to evaluate new and registered herbicides for weed control and potato tolerance.

Methods

Three trials were conducted at the Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR to evaluate new herbicides for weed control efficacy and crop tolerance in potatoes. Potatoes were planted April 23 and 27 in a silt loam soil with a pH 7.6 and 2.4 percent O.M. Seed pieces were planted in 36-in wide rows every 9 in. Preemergence herbicides were applied May 7, and postemergence applications of rimsulfuron were made June 6. Preemergence treatments were incorporated with overhead irrigation immediately after they were applied. Treatments were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer delivering 20 gpa at 30 psi. Plots were irrigated with sprinklers according to crop requirements throughout the season.

Variety response and Weed Control with Sonalan and Sulfentrazone

For this trial, three potato varieties (Russet Burbank, Shepody, Umatilla) were planted in adjacent rows. Plots were 12-ft wide by 30-ft long and consisted of one row of each variety with border rows of Russet Burbank on each side. The experiment was a split-plot design with herbicide treatments as the whole plot and varieties as the subplots. Treatments were replicated four times. Each plot was evaluated for weed control and all varieties (center 3 rows) were harvested and used to calculate potato yields.

Evaluation of Preemergence Herbicides for Weed Control in Shepody Potatoes

In this trial, only Shepody potatoes were planted in plots 4-rows wide and 30-ft long. Treatments were replicated three times. The center two rows of each plot were harvested and graded to determine yields.

Tolerance of Shepody Potatoes to BAS 656 07 H

This trial was conducted to evaluate BAS 656 07 H for crop injury at normal field-use rates and at twice the normal field-use rate, and to compare it to other standard herbicides applied at twice their labeled-use rates. BAS 656 07 H is an active isomer of the herbicide Frontier (dimethenamid), and a package has been submitted to EPA for its registration on potatoes. Plots were 4-rows wide and 30-ft long. Treatments were replicated four times, and the center two rows of each plot were harvested and graded to determine yields. Plots were maintained weed-free by hand weeding.

Results and Discussion

The Malheur Experiment Station was hit by a severe hail storm on July 4 that removed a lot of the potato foliage, damaged stems, and exposed the potato hills. The month following the hail storm, air temperatures were extremely high. The combination of the hail and heat caused a large percentage of potato tubers to be small in size or misshapen. Opening the crop canopy back up also allowed additional weeds to germinate and grow. Both potato yields and weed control were affected by these environmental occurrences.

Variety response and Weed Control with Sonalan and Sulfentrazone

In this study, control of redroot pigweed and common lambsquarters on June 22 was nearly complete with the exception of Eptam applied alone (Table 1). Eptam alone provided little broadleaf control. Also at the June evaluation, Sonalan, Eptam, and Sencor alone provided among the least control of hairy nightshade and barnyardgrass. All other treatments provided 88 percent or greater control of hairy nightshade and barnyardgrass.

In September, Sonalan and Sonalan plus Eptam provided less redroot pigweed control than most other treatments. Eptam alone continued to provide the least control of any of the broadleaf weeds. Hairy nightshade control was poor for the majority of the treatments, with Matrix providing greater control than Sonalan, Eptam, and Sencor alone. Applications of sulfentrazone alone or in combinations provided complete control of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and hairy nightshade. Sulfentrazone applied alone was weak on barnyardgrass but control was improved with the addition of Sencor. Combining sulfentrazone with herbicides with grass activity could provide a very effective weed control program.

The hail storm and extreme heat affected potato yield and quality and resulted in variable yield data. Because of variability, yield data is presented as treatment averages within Russet Burbank (Table 2), Shepody (Table 3), and Umatilla (Table 4) varieties. Total yields and marketable potato yields in all three varieties were among the lowest with Sonalan, Eptam, and Sencor applied alone. Matrix alone and tank mixture treatments produced among the highest potato yields in all three varieties. Sulfentrazone alone also produced among the highest total and marketable yields in Shepody and Umatilla varieties but produced less total marketable tubers in Russet Burbank than Matrix applied alone. The percentage of number one tubers for the Shepody variety was the highest in plots with the poorest weed control, while the percentage of number one tubers in the Umatilla variety was lowest in plots with poor weed control. Reduced yields in some tuber sizes with sulfentrazone treatments may have been due to barnyardgrass competition, but sulfentrazone needs to be evaluated in weed-free conditions to ensure yield reductions are not associated with its use.

Evaluation of Preemergence Herbicides for Weed Control in Shepody Potatoes

Weed control with preemergence herbicides in general was good because of the high rainfall in May. Redroot pigweed control was greater than 95 percent for all treatments on June 20 (Table 5). By September 21, control of redroot pigweed was still nearly complete with all treatments with the exception of Prowl applied alone. Control of common lambsquarters was among the lowest for Dual II Magnum on June 6, while Matrix, Eptam plus Matrix, Dual II Magnum, and Dual were among the poorest on September 21. Nightshade evaluations were variable with few clear separations among the treatments. The addition of BAS 656 07 H to Sencor or Matrix significantly improved control of hairy nightshade on both evaluation dates. Prowl alone provided less control of barnyardgrass than all other treatments on September 21. All herbicide treatments increased potato yields in comparison to the untreated check for most tuber sizes with the exception of 4-6 oz tubers (Table 6).

Tolerance of Shepody Potatoes to BAS 656 07 H

Potato injury was evident June 5 in plots treated with twice the labeled rate of Frontier and two times the standard rate of BAS 656 07 H as compared to the untreated plots (Table 7). Dual applied at twice the labeled rate also caused some stunting early in the season. Injury was primarily stunting and disappeared as the crop developed. The standard rate of BAS 656 07 H and Prowl applied at twice the field rate did not injure potatoes. Large fluctuations in potato yields were not significant because of the high variability. However at the 10 percent significance level, Prowl applied at twice the labeled rate produced higher total yield and total marketable yields than all other treatments except for BAS 656 07 H applied at the standard rate (0.64 lb ai/acre). All treatments produced potato yields equal to or greater than the hand-weeded control.

Table 1. Weed control on June 22 and September 21 with Sonalan and sulfentrazone combinations, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.

Weed control

Redroot

pigweed

Common lambsquarters

Barnyardgrass

Hairy nightshade

Treatment

Rate Timing 6-22 9-21 6-22 9-21 6-22 9-21 6-22 9-21

lb ai/acre ------------------------------------------------%----------------------------------------------

Sonalan

0.94 PRE 92 86 96 94 72 84 24 16

Eptam

3.0 PRE 5 0 5 5 69 75 13 10

Matrix

0.016 PRE 98 99 98 84 93 90 85 56

Sencor

0.25 PRE 96 90 98 98 70 73 63 21

Sonalan + Eptam

0.94 + 3.0 PRE 95 84 98 93 97 91 71 41

Sonalan + Eptam + Matrix

0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 PRE + POST 98 99 96 93 98 94 92 65

Sonalan + Matrix

0.94 + 0.016 PRE 98 100 98 93 98 88 85 48

Eptam + Sencor

3.0 + 0.25 PRE 98 100 98 100 90 75 81 44

Sencor + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 98 99 98 100 95 90 85 70

Sulfentrazone

0.25 PRE 98 100 98 100 92 71 98 100

Sulfentrazone

0.31 PRE 98 100 98 100 88 68 98 100

Sulfentrazone + Sencor

0.25 + 0.25 PRE 98 100 98 100 97 91 98 100

Sulfentrazone + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 98 100 98 100 95 85 98 100

Untreated

- - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LSD (0.05)

6 11 3 8 12 15 15 29

Table 2. Russet Burbank tuber yield and grade in response to preemergence herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.

US number one Total

no.2

Total

marketable

Total

yield

Treatment

Rate Timing 4-6 oz 6-12 oz > 12 oz Total %

lb ai/acre ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ % -------------cwt/acre-------------

Sonalan

0.94 PRE 113 81 2 196 51 64 260 388

Eptam

3.0 PRE 86 46 1 134 45 35 169 304

Matrix

0.016 PRE 91 99 12 202 41 175 377 492

Sencor

0.25 PRE 103 87 2 192 48 71 263 401

Sonalan + Eptam

0.94 + 3.0 PRE 100 128 10 238 52 113 350 465

Sonalan + Eptam + Matrix

0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 PRE + POST 94 130 12 236 47 154 390 504

Sonalan + Matrix

0.94 + 0.016 PRE 96 88 12 196 41 164 360 479

Eptam + Sencor

3.0 + 0.25 PRE 102 102 12 215 46 137 353 479

Sencor + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 106 99 13 218 46 130 348 479

Sulfentrazone

0.25 PRE 64 68 5 137 31 171 309 452

Sulfentrazone

0.31 PRE 87 80 6 173 40 143 316 440

Sulfentrazone + Sencor

0.25 + 0.25 PRE 76 73 13 161 33 212 373 486

Sulfentrazone + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 72 76 2 150 32 194 344 477

Untreated

- - 73 42 1 116 44 20 136 264

LSD (0.05)

21 33 NS 42 9 48 48 58

Table 3. Shepody tuber yield and grade in response to preemergence herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.

US number one Total

no.2

Total

marketable

Total

yield

Treatment

Rate Timing 4-6 oz 6-12 oz > 12 oz Total %

lb ai/acre ---------------------cwt/acre----------------- % -------------cwt/acre-------------

Sonalan

0.94 PRE 67 154 24 244 68 53 298 359

Eptam

3.0 PRE 73 112 12 197 74 17 213 268

Matrix

0.016 PRE 81 126 21 228 50 162 390 454

Sencor

0.25 PRE 67 123 17 207 62 82 289 340

Sonalan + Eptam

0.94 + 3.0 PRE 77 121 14 212 53 130 342 404

Sonalan + Eptam + Matrix

0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 PRE + POST 60 161 17 238 53 143 381 447

Sonalan + Matrix

0.94 + 0.016 PRE 67 130 15 211 50 140 351 422

Eptam + Sencor

3.0 + 0.25 PRE 65 154 27 246 58 121 367 428

Sencor + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 62 125 27 214 47 173 387 456

Sulfentrazone

0.25 PRE 63 110 25 198 50 144 342 395

Sulfentrazone

0.31 PRE 77 101 13 191 49 143 334 397

Sulfentrazone + Sencor

0.25 + 0.25 PRE 82 126 22 230 53 134 363 437

Sulfentrazone + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 51 124 29 204 47 163 367 434

Untreated

- - 68 70 6 144 66 22 166 225

LSD (0.05)

NS 37 NS 47 11 50 55 62

Table 4. Umatilla tuber yield and grade in response to preemergence herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.

US number one Total

no.2

Total

marketable

Total

yield

Treatment

Rate Timing 4-6 oz 6-12 oz > 12 oz Total %

lb ai/acre ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ % -------------cwt/acre-------------

Sonalan

0.94 PRE 128 69 1 199 58 16 215 340

Eptam

3.0 PRE 84 31 2 117 48 9 126 245

Matrix

0.016 PRE 147 154 11 312 66 53 365 474

Sencor

0.25 PRE 128 95 8 232 64 21 253 362

Sonalan + Eptam

0.94 + 3.0 PRE 150 128 4 283 65 29 311 432

Sonalan + Eptam + matrix

0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 PRE + POST 128 164 14 306 64 71 377 479

Sonalan + Matrix

0.94 + 0.016 PRE 141 101 17 259 55 89 348 473

Eptam + Sencor

3.0 + 0.25 PRE 132 123 4 259 61 47 306 424

Sencor + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 141 154 8 303 61 53 355 494

Sulfentrazone

0.25 PRE 140 128 6 274 61 50 324 447

Sulfentrazone

0.31 PRE 147 94 5 246 57 56 302 429

Sulfentrazone + Sencor

0.25 + 0.25 PRE 130 136 6 273 58 87 360 469

Sulfentrazone + Matrix

0.25 + 0.016 PRE 130 95 3 227 51 79 306 446

Untreated

- - 61 22 0 83 37 2 85 213

LSD (0.05)

38 40 NS 57 10 41 55 55

Table 5. Weed control with Prowl, Dual, and BAS 656 07 H, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.

Weed control

Redroot

pigweed

Common lambsquarters

Barnyardgrass

Hairy nightshade

Treatment

Rate Timing 6-20 9-21 6-20 9-21 6-20 9-21 6-20 9-21

lb ai/acre -----------------------------------------------%-----------------------------------------------

Frontier + Sencor

1.17 + 0.5 PRE 98 100 98 99 98 99 95 87

BAS 656 07 H + Sencor

0.64 + 0.5 PRE 98 99 98 98 98 100 98 97

BAS 656 07 H + Matrix

0.016 PRE 98 99 98 99 98 100 97 93

Eptam + Sencor

3.0 + 0.5 PRE 98 97 98 100 98 100 92 90

Prowl + Sencor

1.0 + 0.5 PRE 98 100 98 100 97 100 93 89

Eptam + Matrix

3.0 + 0.016 PRE 98 100 95 78 98 100 83 67

Matrix

0.016 PRE 98 100 93 75 98 98 78 58

Sencor

0.5 PRE 98 100 98 100 98 98 79 62

Prowl + Matrix

1.0 + 0.016 PRE 98 100 98 100 98 100 96 83

Prowl + Eptam

1.0 + 3.0 PRE 98 97 98 98 98 98 96 93

Prowl + Eptam + Sencor

1.0 + 3.0 + 0.5 PRE 98 100 98 100 98 100 92 94

Prowl +

Matrix

1.0 +

0.016

PRE + POST 98 100 98 100 98 100 98 96

Prowl

1.0 PRE 95 88 98 97 94 92 96 81

Dual Magnum

1.9 PRE 98 100 90 86 98 100 95 85

Dual II Magnum

1.9 PRE 98 98 73 83 98 100 75 60

Dual

2.0 PRE 98 97 85 80 89 100 84 67

BAS 65607 +

Matrix

0.64 +

0.016

PRE + POST 98 100 89 87 98 100 90 83

Untreated

- - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LSD (0.05)

2 4 13 12 7 5 15 24

Table 6. Tuber yield and quality with Prowl, Dual, and BAS 656 07 H, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.

US number one Total

no.2

Total

marketable

Total

yield

Treatment

Rate Timing 4-6 oz 6-12 oz > 12 oz Total %

lb ai/acre ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ % -------------cwt/acre-------------

Frontier + Sencor

1.17 + 0.5 PRE 62 134 41 237 49 190 426 487

BAS 656 07 H + Sencor

0.64 + 0.5 PRE 57 143 40 240 54 142 382 444

BAS 656 07 H + Matrix

0.016 PRE 70 161 43 274 56 156 430 489

Eptam + Sencor

3.0 + 0.5 PRE 56 164 39 259 56 141 401 462

Prowl + Sencor

1.0 + 0.5 PRE 60 158 45 263 56 156 418 471

Eptam + Matrix

3.0 + 0.016 PRE 61 136 37 234 49 166 400 473

Matrix

0.016 PRE 67 153 32 252 56 131 383 445

Sencor

0.5 PRE 59 159 37 254 56 143 397 451

Prowl + Matrix

1.0 + 0.016 PRE 61 162 27 250 49 187 437 512

Prowl + Eptam

1.0 + 3.0 PRE 71 151 30 252 52 168 419 490

Prowl + Eptam + Sencor

1.0 + 3.0 + 0.5 PRE 46 164 58 267 57 149 416 469

Prowl + Matrix

1.0 + 0.016 PRE + POST 59 155 49 263 52 172 435 503

Prowl

1.0 PRE 62 161 41 264 55 157 421 484

Dual Magnum

1.9 PRE 53 137 39 229 52 137 366 441

Dual II Magnum

1.9 PRE 69 162 38 268 56 141 409 476

Dual

2.0 PRE 59 170 31 259 60 113 372 436

BAS 656 07 H + Matrix

0.64 + 0.016 PRE + POST 54 148 59 261 56 153 413 462

Untreated

- - 66 92 4 162 64 24 186 252

LSD (0.05)

NS 33 23 45 7 37 57 62

Table 7. Potato injury and yield in response to BAS 656 07 H applications, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.

Injury US number ones Total

Treatment

Rate

Field rate

6-5

6-20

4-6 oz

6-12 oz

>12 oz

Total

%

Two's

Market-

able

Yield

lb ai/acre ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ % -------------cwt/acre-------------

Frontier 6.0

2.34 23 0 58 134 29 220 48 177 397 461

BAS 656 07 H

0.64 9 0 57 138 25 219 46 191 410 482

BAS 656 07 H

1.28 24 0 61 139 20 220 47 178 398 469

Dual

4.0 11 0 62 121 23 206 45 192 398 460

Prowl

3.0 1 0 60 155 39 253 49 197 450 522

Untreated

- - 0 0 58 131 30 218 46 182 400 475

LSD (0.05) Injury

LSD (0.10) Yields

9 NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

42

44


Potato Reports Potato Crop Page 
Home  Annual Reports  Table Of Contents 

For additional information about the Malheur Agricultural Experiment Station, please send an e-mail request to:
Dr. Clinton C. Shock
Clinton.Shock@orst.edu

Malheur Agricultural Experiment Station

595 Onion Avenue
Ontario, OR 97914
(541) 889-2174
FAX (541) 889-7831 
OSU Home Page

Last updated 12-09-1999.