|
Great Basin Redband Trout
2010 Results

The summer 2010 field season was the
fourth of six sampling efforts to
assess the distribution and abundance of redband trout in the six
interior basins of Oregon’s high desert. Abundance was evaluated at the
Species Management Unit (SMU) level for the Chewaucan, Fort Rock, Malheur Lakes, and Catlow
Valley SMUs and at the
population level in Goose Lake and Warner Valley
SMUs.
Sites were randomly selected using
EPA's Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified design
protocol. We selected 30 sites for the Chewaucan,
Fort Rock and Catlow Valley SMU’s and 40 sites in the Malheur Lakes
basin. We also selected 30 sites for each population assessed in the
Goose Lake and Warner Valley, except the Thomas-Bauers Complex and
Dry populations in Goose Lake had 40 and 20 sites,
respectively. Actual number of sites sampled approached but
did not completely meet these targets. However, we were able to sample nearly
83% of selected sites
across
the range of each SMU. Extensive efforts (public meetings, letters, personal
phone calls and visits) were made to obtain permission to access sites
located on private property. Field methods used to sample each site were
the same as those used in
2007.
Length frequency analysis was used
to categorize redband trout as
either age 0 or age 1+ fish. Separate age-class designations were made in each of six SMUs. Population
estimates for age 1+ redband trout in each SMU were extrapolated from estimates of fish density at sample sites.
A calibration factor, calculated from the mean ratio between the depletion and mark-recapture density
estimates at all sites where both methods were employed, was applied to estimates for all SMUs.
Depletion estimates were completed at 272 sites across the 2,340 km sample frame (potential summer distribution)
of Great Basin redband trout. The final calibrated population estimates ranged from
18,000-277,000 at
the SMU scale and from 300-37,000 at the
population-scale. The precision of these estimates ranged from ±22% to ±167% and varied relative to the between-site
variability (CV) and sample size for each sample stratum.
Densities estimated at individual sites
were highly variable (density histograms).
|
RESULTS |
|
SMU |
Population |
n |
Estimate |
Lower 95% Confidence Limit
|
Upper 95% Confidence Limit |
Relative 95% Confidence Interval |
CV |
|
Catlow Valley |
|
13 |
17,982 |
10,011 |
25,953 |
44 % |
1.35 |
|
Chewaucan |
|
30 |
131,995 |
82,906 |
181,085 |
37 % |
1.29 |
|
Fort
Rock |
|
27 |
33,548 |
25,474 |
41,623 |
24 % |
0.68 |
|
Malheur Lakes |
|
36 |
277,354 |
150,006 |
404,701 |
46 % |
1.04 |
|
Goose Lake |
|
87 |
48,862 |
37,717 |
60,007 |
23 % |
1.27 |
| |
Drews |
20 |
10,630 |
5,507 |
15,753 |
48 % |
1.47 |
| |
Dry |
4 |
287 |
5 |
765 |
167 % |
1.73 |
| |
Eastside |
21 |
14,599 |
11,450 |
17,747 |
22 % |
0.60 |
| |
Thomas |
22 |
18,191 |
10,293 |
26,088 |
43 % |
1.34 |
| |
West
Goose |
20 |
5,156 |
111 |
10,200 |
98 % |
2.47 |
|
Warner Lakes |
|
79 |
63,905 |
44,222 |
83,587 |
31 % |
1.49 |
| |
Deep |
30 |
37,227 |
19,498 |
54,955 |
48 % |
1.58 |
| |
Honey |
20 |
11,657 |
6,884 |
16,431 |
41 % |
1.19 |
| |
20mile |
29 |
15,021 |
7,927 |
22,114 |
47 % |
1.51 |
Contact Stephanie Miller or
Steve Jacobs with questions or comments.
|